Singapore Straits Times co-operates with Sin Chew Daily for pushing the defamation to PM Mr Najib.
According to the news, Saiful’s father, Mr Azlan Mohd Lazim accused a special officer in Mr Najib’s office for defaming Anwar.
- This is mysteriously strange but deceiving character of Mr Azlan towards his son.
- He had the statement seemed all prepared on the script writing as though not from his own factual information.
- On 11th Jan 2012, Mr Azlan pleaded with the attorney-general to appeal the acquittal of Anwar Ibrahim on a sodomy charge against his son.
But why now Mr Azlan has sided the man who had sodomised his son and finally apologised to the culprit?
(i) Is there any political motive for Mr Azlan making such an accusation
against Mr Najib under heavily guarded press conference by the PKR?
(ii) Are there any financial reasons involved in these bouncing slander games?
(iii) Whose money was involved in the heavy security for PKR?
(iv) What is the objective of Singapore Straits Times for republishing this article?
Such an offensive and contemptuous writer who keeps on repeating PM Najib’s involvement in Altatunya’s murder despite PM Najib’s denial several times in his oath. He should face the consequences as a result.
H.S.
Standard Singapore sekarang mcm helah peniaga2 jual no ekor tepi longkang..Mat saleh tak lagi tolong Singapork kerana bertahun2 educate..mcm babi jugak depa ni
ReplyDeleteAquittal means they have to drop the case temporary. The case can be opened again if new evidence are produced. How come the Procecutor became PKR member (homo)?
ReplyDeleteWe all know the fact that...
Anwar did it in the shitta hole..., shitta hole..., shitta hole...
Anwar did it in the shitta hole..., in Saifuls pretty buttock.
(Song: The three little pigs, check youtube)
Pig 1: Anwar Ibrahim
Pig 2: Lim Guan Eng
Pig 3: Hadi Awang
AKHIRNYA JUBOR SI SAIPOL DIBERSIHKAN OLEH BAPAKNYA SENDIRI..BAPAKNYA DAH SEMAKIN TUA..DAH TAK SANGGUP LAGI NAK BOHONG ORANG RAMAI TERUS MENERUS..MAKA DIA PUN BERTAUBAT DAN MENCERITAKAN PERKARA SEBENAR..SI SAIPOL ANJING BILA LAGI NAK BERTAUBAT???UDAH2 LAH...INGAT DOSA SIKIT WAHAI ANJING!!!!JANGAN IKUT PERANGAI SI TUA MATHIR A/L MAMAT KUTTY TU...DAH TUA NYANYUK NAK MAMPOSS PUN MASIH MENFITNAH KERJANYA...
ReplyDeleteKau samakan saiful anjing, dari ko tulis, taraf kau lebih jauh bawah dari haiwan....so sape kau....semoga kamu diberi hidayah sebelum nyawa kamu dicabut dlm keadaan kotor lagi hina.
DeleteWhen the Straits Chinese Times make Sin Chew and MI their reference point, the answer is velly velly simple. Everyone on the editorial boards were Chinese, everyone of them were subservient to DAP/PAP. Everyone one of them were anti Malay government and everyone of them were saved by their new found belief Christianity. To them Malay Muslims were the 'kaffir' and turning Malaysia into a Chinese christian nation is their ultimate aim. PAP is staunchly anti communist, DAP is pro communist! The middle road is a common belief in Christianity. Problem solved.
ReplyDeleteDS Najib and BN is their only obstacle, so their strategy is, 'kill the head of the snake and the body will follow suit'.
Demonize DS Najib and Malaysia is theirs for the taking. The Malays can be made into pariahs in their own country.
It might sound strange, but it is happening.
I was heard dis that DAP is pro communist.pls enlighten me based on DAP did in png can be categorize as pro communist.
DeleteKeputusan Hakim dan kenyataan karpal pon sama...kejadian liwat berlaku atas dasar SUKA SAMA SUKA......
ReplyDeleteYeeeeehaaaaa...bakal piiemm Malaysia pakar depan dan blakang...
Straits Times spork ni tahap surat khabar buat cuci berak anwar dan gang dap aje.
ReplyDeleteStrait time sana berani kutk pm kita cuba meka kutuk pm meka..ayau media kita kutuk pm meka tentu pm dia angin satu badan dan akan saman ..u ulang i sama u heheh
ReplyDeleteThis is another desparate attempt to create certain perception about Anwar's and Altantuya's case. As we all know theres nothing that anyone from anywhere can produce any evidence as to prove Najib's, involvement in altantuya's case.
ReplyDeleteI want to know from all the numbers of cybertroopers deployed by Pakatan leadership why not even one can produce the picture of Najib with Altantuya as claimed.
And they said that it has to do with the Scorpene case and subpeona will be sent to Malaysia at any time! but until now nothing is sent, I repeat nothing is sent!
Before this there was Deepak and now i'm asking where is he and his claim? This can only lead to one conclusion and that is all these writings are just rubbish. remember you people, if you read rubbish, you will think rubbish and finally you will act rubbish.
Alahai Anon 10.55 AM... Tak kena pd diri sendiri, bolehlah kutuk org... Kalau berlaku pd diri sendiri, adakah anda akan mendiamkan saja (mungkinlah kalau suka sama suka)... Anda juga harus bertaubat, senang2 mengata org anjing, dan tak pasal2 mengaitkan Tun pulak...
ReplyDeleteFirstly every one should know that it was Saiful who accused Anwar and not his father.
ReplyDeleteSecondly, Saiful's father is (till to-date) a staunch supporter of PKR.
Thirdly, he supported his son (Saiful) from day one including urging AG chamber to speed up the appeal against the HCourt Judgment.
Forth: Mr Azlan was reported missing for few weeks before he appeared "in a closed door sessiobn" before a group of reporters supporting the opposition.Fift point: Why Mr Azlan took almost 5 years to come up with such "stupid statement". Why didn'nt he inform the authority on the first day he was questioned by the authority (if there was any statement recorded fom him). Last but not least, we challange Mr Azlan to perform "sumpah laknat" as done by Saiful personnaly. We dare Mr Azlan. Otherwise it can be concluded that Mr Azlan statement was some kind of "conspiracy"?
Firstly every one should know that it was Saiful who accused Anwar and not his father.
ReplyDeleteSecondly, Saiful's father is (till to-date) a staunch supporter of PKR.
Thirdly, he supported his son (Saiful) from day one including urging AG chamber to speed up the appeal against the HCourt Judgment.
Forth: Mr Azlan was reported missing for few weeks before he appeared "in a closed door sessiobn" before a group of reporters supporting the opposition.Fift point: Why Mr Azlan took almost 5 years to come up with such "stupid statement". Why didn'nt he inform the authority on the first day he was questioned by the authority (if there was any statement recorded fom him). Last but not least, we challange Mr Azlan to perform "sumpah laknat" as done by Saiful personnaly. We dare Mr Azlan. Otherwise it can be concluded that Mr Azlan statement was some kind of "conspiracy"?
Firstly every one should know that it was Saiful who accused Anwar and not his father.
ReplyDeleteSecondly, Saiful's father is (till to-date) a staunch supporter of PKR.
Thirdly, he supported his son (Saiful) from day one including urging AG chamber to speed up the appeal against the HCourt Judgment.
Forth: Mr Azlan was reported missing for few weeks before he appeared "in a closed door sessiobn" before a group of reporters supporting the opposition.Fift point: Why Mr Azlan took almost 5 years to come up with such "stupid statement". Why didn'nt he inform the authority on the first day he was questioned by the authority (if there was any statement recorded fom him). Last but not least, we challange Mr Azlan to perform "sumpah laknat" as done by Saiful personnaly. We dare Mr Azlan. Otherwise it can be concluded that Mr Azlan statement was some kind of "conspiracy"?
Firstly every one should know that it was Saiful who accused Anwar and not his father.
ReplyDeleteSecondly, Saiful's father is (till to-date) a staunch supporter of PKR.
Thirdly, he supported his son (Saiful) from day one including urging AG chamber to speed up the appeal against the HCourt Judgment.
Forth: Mr Azlan was reported missing for few weeks before he appeared "in a closed door sessiobn" before a group of reporters supporting the opposition.Fift point: Why Mr Azlan took almost 5 years to come up with such "stupid statement". Why didn'nt he inform the authority on the first day he was questioned by the authority (if there was any statement recorded fom him). Last but not least, we challange Mr Azlan to perform "sumpah laknat" as done by Saiful personnaly. We dare Mr Azlan. Otherwise it can be concluded that Mr Azlan statement was some kind of "conspiracy"?
Firstly every one should know that it was Saiful who accused Anwar and not his father.
ReplyDeleteSecondly, Saiful's father is (till to-date) a staunch supporter of PKR.
Thirdly, he supported his son (Saiful) from day one including urging AG chamber to speed up the appeal against the HCourt Judgment.
Forth: Mr Azlan was reported missing for few weeks before he appeared "in a closed door sessiobn" before a group of reporters supporting the opposition.Fift point: Why Mr Azlan took almost 5 years to come up with such "stupid statement". Why didn'nt he inform the authority on the first day he was questioned by the authority (if there was any statement recorded fom him). Last but not least, we challange Mr Azlan to perform "sumpah laknat" as done by Saiful personnaly. We dare Mr Azlan. Otherwise it can be concluded that Mr Azlan statement was some kind of "conspiracy"?
Firstly every one should know that it was Saiful who accused Anwar and not his father.
ReplyDeleteSecondly, Saiful's father is (till to-date) a staunch supporter of PKR.
Thirdly, he supported his son (Saiful) from day one including urging AG chamber to speed up the appeal against the HCourt Judgment.
Forth: Mr Azlan was reported missing for few weeks before he appeared "in a closed door sessiobn" before a group of reporters supporting the opposition.Fift point: Why Mr Azlan took almost 5 years to come up with such "stupid statement". Why didn'nt he inform the authority on the first day he was questioned by the authority (if there was any statement recorded fom him). Last but not least, we challange Mr Azlan to perform "sumpah laknat" as done by Saiful personnaly. We dare Mr Azlan. Otherwise it can be concluded that Mr Azlan statement was some kind of "conspiracy"?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=RWxntDmXxxA#!
ReplyDeletekejamnya umno..jahil jahil jahil!!!
Anom ;
ReplyDeleteMarch 11, 2013 at 10:55 AM
KAU MEMANG MANUSIA BUTA AKAL, TAK TAHU MANA KEPALA DAN EKOR.
KAU TAK TAHU BERFIKIR PINTAR DAN MENUNTUT KEBENARAN.
SEBAB ITU KAU BERSEBAHAT DENGAN ALJUBURI DAN PAK CIK TUA AZLAN YANG MAKAN BANYAK JUTA WANG RINGGIT SUAPAN ANWAR SANGGUP MENJUAL NAMA ANAKNYA DAN PM NAJIB YANG TIDAK BERDOSA. KAU DENGAN ALJUBURI SAMA PEMFITNAH !!!!
sebenarnya bapa saiful yang kena liwat tu sebab dia kata semuanya konspirasi?? bukannya saiful yang kena liwat?? nanti bapa saiful nak sumpah laknat yang dia tak kena liwat??
ReplyDeletepelik?? kenapa bapa saiful buat sidang akhbar tertutup??? saya lebih percaya dengan saiful sebab dia dah sumpah laknat bercakap benar yang dia diliwat oleh anuwar??? tapi klu bapa saiful sumpah laknat dengan kenyataannya yang dia bercakap benar dan dia tahu itu konspirasi...baru aku blh caya...tapi setakat sidang akhbar tertutup sape2 pun blh cakap??? kenapa mesti dah dekat pilihanraya???
ReplyDeletekenapa video(bukti) dgn china doll dan video naik lif dgn eskay tak di keluarkan oleh akhbar singapo?? harap dapat dedahkan lagi video lain moral anuwar(bukti) jika ada...kerana mengikut TG Haji Hadi wajib kita dedahkan keburukan pemimpin??? sebab sekarang ni diorang sebuk fitnah PM (tak ada bukti yg kukuh pun spt video)??
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteST SPORE DIA TAKUT DGN LEE KUAN YEW. TUPASAL CARI BERITA KAT LUAR.
ReplyDeletebapak tak sanggup buat sumpah laknat....ngeh...ngeh...ngeh...dari situ kita tahu dia penipu...hanya org macam anon 10:55 je yg masih bodoh bingai sbb hati dah hitam tertutup...lain kali skolah pandai pandai sket....setakat maki hamun je lah keje ko!!idea bernas takdak! LOL!
ReplyDeleteBapa sipol menghilangkan diri selama hampir lima minggu.
ReplyDeleteKe mana dia?
Mungkin kena kidnap.
Siapa?
Setelah timbul semula bercakap seperti mamak mabuk.
Pooorah wak lan, tak ada orang percaya cakap ko
anon 1055 sebenarnye lah yang kene de-jubbs dulu baru si azlan, nuar de-jubbs mana tau tua ke muda, dulu semua dia balun...cume pencacai2 yg uritaK KENE PENANGAN DE-jUBBS AL jUBBS aje yang tak serik2 membontoti de AlJubbs, malang isu nye Al JUBBS tapi masih nak kaitkan mahathir, lu pegilah nangis ramai2 tenguk NaJis makan cendul tepi jalan, lepas tu pakai baju pagoda main air, contoh pemimpin2 yg suka makan ahgin, tak tau buat keje...PRiot, PRascal, PRacist....bodo punye Cai2
ReplyDeletePEKONG P SAID, We all know the fact that...
ReplyDeleteAnwar did it in the shitta hole..., shitta hole..., shitta hole...
Anwar did it in the shitta hole..., in Saifuls pretty buttock.
(Song: The three little pigs, check youtube)
Pig 1: Anwar Ibrahim
Pig 2: Lim Guan Eng
Pig 3: Hadi Awang IN ADDITION; WILD BOAR 4; AZLAN DE OL-ASS
SAPE PERCAYA CAKAP SI AZLAN TU MAKNA NYE, ORG TU ADA TUMPANG SEMANGKUK MENADAH BONTOT NYE BUAT EHSAN DE ALJUBBURI, TAK KIRA SAPE PUN, SHAME ON YOU,FOR STILL WANTING AND DESPERATE FOR ANUAL LOVE ANAL SPECIES, BOOO DOOO LU
ReplyDeletesINGAPORK lEE kUAN YOU DULU PONG NAK TADAH BONTOTNYE BUAT SI NUA GILAKUASA TU,EEE GELI AYA
ReplyDeleteAkhbar Straits Times Singapura terkutuk, bangsat kerana memalukan PM DS Najib. Kaki tangan penjawat STS adalah memehak kepada kerajaan PAP yang bersebahat dengan Pakatan Rosak, dan DAPigs adalah cawangan parti mereka.
ReplyDelete1. Bapa Saiful Azlan adalah seorang banduan pembelut durjana, sama seperti Lajim dari Sabah.
2. Sudah tentu semua kertas kenyataan Azlan di karang oleh ketua PKR Aljuburi, kerana skrip tuduhan yang dibaca oleh Azlan seolah isi hati busuk dengki khianat Aljuburi sendiri untuk memalukan PM D S Najib.
3. Azlan sudah memberitahu media pada 11hb Jan 2012 tentang kekecewaan beliau atas kekalahan kes sodomi anaknya Saiful, tetapi kita mesti ingat, kes sodomi Aljuburi memang berlaku terhadap Saiful, itu bukan pembohongan, hakim Zabidah tidak menghebahkan, cuma beliau menutup kes sodomi kerana beliau tidak percaya dengan bukti yang dikeluarkan oleh pehak Saiful.
Ada udang disebalik batu, apabila Azlan kemudian memehak kepada Aljuburi, kerana ‘kepakaran cara saikoloji penipuan’ Aljuburi mencucuk pemikiran Azlan . Pilihan raya akan menjelang, jadi bagi Aljuburi, semuanya dirancang terlebih dahulu dalam dairi Aljuburi bagaimana membeli kepercayaan dari rakyat kepada PKR.
(i) Aljuburi sendiri sentiasa resah jika penipuan nya boleh dipedayakan oleh pehak perisik musuh, oleh itu sang peliwat mahu terus di sekat penjagaan ketat sekeliling pehak media.
(ii) Sebagai ganjaran Azlan meragut dengan rakusnya tuntutan wang ringgit yang dijanjikan oleh sang peliwat, ini bukan tuntutan kosong sahaja.
(iii) PKR gunakan bermacam-macam tabung kewangan mereka. Kita mesti ingat, Aljuburi bukan pemimpin pembangkang yang miskin.
(iv) Tujuan akhbar STS mendedahkan kes ini kerana mereka mahu menaikkan kepercayaan penyokong pembangkang yang tinggal di Singapura dan menanamkan semangat benci oleh pembaca Singapura kepada Umno.
Wartawan penipu bangsat, wartawan dayus musuh Allah mengulangi kes penglibatan DS Najib dengan pembunuhan Altatunya. Sepatutnya wartawan ini di tangkap, disoal dan disaman kerana membuat pencetakan fitnah palsu bertalu-talu untuk menghina PM DS Najib.