Tuesday, March 26, 2013

NGO ( IDEAS ) TERPAKSA MEMFITNAH DAN BERBOHONG DI SINGAPURA SEMATA-MATA NAK HANTAM NAJIB !



This article is written by Wan Saiful Wan Jan, chief executive of the IDEAS (Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs), an independent think-thank in Malaysia.



Wan Saiful Wan Jan, resembles a lost dreamer analyst who indulges himself in two-folded capacity of mind; both from a born loser to a represented denial for the sake of opposing.  



Just as I read from the beginning paragraphs to tthe hird one, credits were plainly presented to the effective government of BN under the leadership of PM Mr Najib Razak. Wan Saiful inevitably cannot deny the achievable targets under Malaysian Economic and Government Transformation Programmes.



In the rest of paragraphs, one needs guts to shatter his writing to pieces as his negative opinions need a lot of attention.



1.     Wan Saiful Wan Jan then overturned PM Mr Najib’s excellent report card.



·       He wrote just to frame Mr Najib’s into a discredit leader.   



·       Either his evaluation for PM Najib is dishonest or lack of comprehensive assessment for a good leader, or simply to say he intends to spare the excellent merits to Opposition PKR leader, there are all in self-rightful capacity as an independent thinker.



    • He is not in favour of the Malaysian mainstream media for repeating the broadcast clips highlighting the report of Mr Najib’s speech and National Budget. Why did he find it unfavourable? If his attitude is in tune with the effective ruling government, he should apply philosophy methods in his judgement. We must bear in mind that he is a thinker, and a thinker must acquire helicopter views over all diversity of lives.



2.       When the Oppositions had not contributed their constructive and supportive ideas about the case of Lahad Datu, rather than blaming and accusing BN for the incursion; denying the rights of Malaysian Military and Police to execute their responsibility to the nation, how come Wan Saiful Wan Jan rebutts BN’s accurate strong words in retaliation? Is he trying to hide the flaws of PKR leader’s secret plot to turn Sabah into chaos? Deliberately, he gets a chance to slam BN in foreign newspaper like the most welcoming Singapore Straits Times. 



3.     Next he acknowledges himself that PR is not angelic either. Hence,     

        when he admits that Pro-PR media did not report any of BN’s good   

        achievements, something is not right here. There are indeed cases of    

        corruption and cronyisms in the Opposition sides, but why Wan Saiful 

        discard the true facts? As an honest analyst, he should freely anticipate 

        backfires from both political sides is only justification. He must expose

        these immoral values and illegal activities by Oppositions openly to be

        fair.



  1. It is not true to say that PR’s media reach is severely limited. Malaysians Insider and Malaysiakini to name a few, with all other publications and newspapers by Opposition coalitions, have spread like mushrooms in all over Malaysia, inciting provocations and anger among pro-opposition supporters in bickerings against the government by Bersih group, anti-Lynas, rallies by opposition leaders, the undergraduate’s case of bringing down the flag of Mr Najib’s photo, online registration for supporters’ participations in any demonstrations that reach all over Malaysia and Singapore, so how come Wan Saiful could have a cheek to say that media practitioners and editors exercise self-censorship to reduce the risk of action by authorities? Perhaps PR’s media is hiding more rebellious plots in their planned list, so all BN supporters must be vigilant about their next mutinous and defiant activities.



  1. The real victims are citizens including locals and those living in foreign countries, but has Wan Saiful been giving the right information from his part? He must emphasize his fact in No.3 and spread it through pro-PR media. But so far he has been contributing his articles that insult the ruling government from neighbouring country. He contributed his opinions against ruling party to Singapore Straits Times journalists, many times. In addition, there are several false publications circulated through Pro-opposition media, lately is the London-based Global Witness.  



And yet there are also true information written from foreign countries like AustraliaPhilippines, US and Thailand who even contributed their articles giving the genuine mirrors shining the successes and progresses by BN government in economic transformation programmes!



These rivals, coalition politicians leaders have more than enough needs to be catered for, the final analysis is they should not waste their times and effort thinking for unreasonable wishes. It is high time that Wan Saiful Wan Jan tired himself giving privileges for Opposition coalitions.



H.S. 


9 comments:

Anonymous said...

I believe a fresh graduate can do better analysis than this guy from IDEAS. I am sorry to say that because you cannot claim to be neutral when you make analysis like that.You succumb yourself to be a GUTTER ANALYST. By the way I am apolitical, a voter from east malaysian state of sarawak

Anonymous said...

spesis jambu mcm rafizi,cm ni pk seikh mr mansuh suka

Anonymous said...

Wan Saiful Wan Jan....I ashamed of you...The pot calling the kettle black!!!!

Ghazali said...

Manusia ini hanya berani berkokok di luar negara, tetapi tidak berani berhujah dan berdebat dalam negara dengan pihak kerajaan. Izinkan saya mencadangkan supaya kita mewujudkan suatu undang-undang/akta/peraturan supaya manusia seperti ini dilucutkan kerakyatannya apabila kesalahannya terbukti.

Ghazali said...

Manusia ini hanya berani berkokok di luar negara, tetapi tidak berani berhujah dan berdebat dalam negara dengan pihak kerajaan. Izinkan saya mencadangkan supaya kita mewujudkan suatu undang-undang/akta/peraturan supaya manusia seperti ini dilucutkan kerakyatannya apabila kesalahannya terbukti.

celana biru said...

Jangan dengar cakap budak lalut ni.
Nama saja chief exacutif IDEAS tetapi tak dapat memberi pendapat yang tepat. Berat sebelah yang sengal.
Pemerentahan Najib (BN) lebih terserlah drp pemerintahan PR. Ini diakui oleh pakar-pakar ekonomi luar negara. Begitu juga pendapat Daim Zainuddin yang menjangkakan BN akan menang dalam PRU13 ini nanti.

bukit selumpit said...

to me wan saiful is not more than a bias & liar analysist.If he is really a neutral commentor or ananlysist,he should comment on both party,either goverment or opposition.he should say something good to what goverment have been done to improved the quality life of Malaysian people.To me as a non partian,i did not see anything good that the opposition have contributed to support what goverment have done.or at least give some good ideas if they think the goverment transform programme did not contribute anything good to the nation.So please wan saiful,if you really a neutral ananlysist say the true thing about your country.if not just pull stop and fuck off.

Tun Teja said...

Wan Saiful Wan Jan adalah penganjur, pengembang Libertarianisme. Mengikut fahaman beliau,
• Seorang libertarian berhak mempunyai kebebasan memilih cara hidupnya sendiri, dan setiap individu bebas melakukan apa saja selagi dia tidak membahayakan hidup dan hak-hak milik orang lain.
• Setiap libertarian yakin bahawa dia tidak memerlukan batasan terhadap urusan dan keputusan dari pemerintah yang berkuasa. Paksaan dan kekangan keatas seorang individu harus dicegah dan dikecam.
• Dalam semangat kemerdekaan dan kepercayaan diri, seorang libertarian percaya dia ada tanggungjawab dan toleransi.

Terdapat kesan buruk dari fahaman libertarian ini. Bermakna setiap individu boleh memilih cara hidup yang bercanggah dengan ajaran dari Alquran:
• Gaya hidup dengan berkhalwat, gaya hidup secara LGBT, berleseran masa dengan sahabat lelaki tanpa mahram dan tanpa tujuan urusan tertentu, kehidupan songsang seperti Pengkid, kehidupan sebilik bersama suami atau isteri orang lain, kehidupan bersama lelaki atau perempuan yang berlainan ugama di anggap hak kebebasan individu libertarian. Melakukan sex berkumpulan kebebasan libertarian ?
• Incest atau mahram songsang dibenarkan?
Inikah yang diperjuangkan oleh Wan Saiful mengembangkan fahaman Libertarianisme?

Aku harap masyarakat Melayu, generasi X dan Y baby boomers dapat merenungkan sedalam-dalamnya fahaman ini. Adakah kita semua bersedia untuk menerima masyarakat Libertarian pada masa akan datang?

1. Di dalam aspek ekonomi, seorang libertarian berhak menjalankan kegiatan ekonomi tanpa diganggu oleh pihak berkuasa. Lantaran itu, libertarian menekankan bahawa kuasa dan peranan kerajaan atas bidang ekonomi di bataskan agar pasaran bebas daripada kekangan dan monopoli dapat dilaksanakan supaya prinsip ini memakmurkan dan memajukan ekonomi Negara. Ada kebaikan dan keburukan kecuali penganjur Libertarianisme ini dapat menganalisakan lebih luas dalam fahamannya, bukan sahaja dengan fakta yang di wawarkan.
2. Ramai masyarakat akan menafsirkan perbezaan pendapat masing-masing sehingga akhirnya akan menyebabkan kekeliruan mahkamah dalam akta perundangan untuk menyelesaikan setiap kekusutan yang di lakukan oleh setiap libertarian.

Tun Teja said...

Wan Saiful Wan Jan worships PKR leader Anwar Ibrahim.
He believed that Anwar has been conforming permanently trying to discard the practice of living in strong community, like the political organization of Umno, that is contrary to his believe in liberitarianism.