Singapore Straits Times rejoices to unfavourable evaluation of BN manifesto.
Lester Kong repudiates that analysts who failed to interpret BN’s manisfesto optimistically are regarded as counterfeit analysts.
- How can analysts be intelligent enough to predict the impact of BN manifesto?
But they do not have enough time arguing at scrupulous level.
They must dedicate their time and effort to study the comprehensive policy from the lowest stage to the highest stage. These analysts must also use their energy, spending time and watching, joining with the ordinary people and communicating friendly with them. Only then they can go back to their writing tables, writing their observations, collecting data of BN’s progressive results as good as the strong support from the people. If they do not sacrifice their time for analysing political situation daily, they surely come out with humbugs, rubbish opinions.
- But this idiotic journalist has been harassing for the downfall of BN by pushing Merdeka Centre director, Ibrahim Suffian, to speak out against BN manifesto, triggering the latter’s enforces his views on the manifesto in bad light blindly. The director is another suitably chosen candidate by SST to disparage any good policy by BN.
- Lester Kong was dissatisfied with Professor Shamsul Ababi Mamat, a political analyst at UKM. In his conceptualised appreciation, he explains in simple terms to the journalist. It is praiseworthy for PM Najib to reassure the people that the future of economy ofMalaysia will benefit all strata of society when BN wins. To Lester Kong’s dissatisfaction, he flashes several negative points from other critics.
- At the time when most ordinary Malaysians, welcome the manifesto, there is someone who is totally sick in the mind. Out of malice, she slammed with uncouth words that come out from her evil heart. The person implied is Nurul Izzah supported by the PKR conspirator Ibrahim Suffian.